ARB consults on new rules for disciplinary investigations

The Architects Registration Board (ARB) has today launched a public consultation proposing changes to its Investigations Rules, which are the Rules set out for procedures to be followed in disciplinary investigations.

Consultation detail

ARB sets the rules for disciplinary investigations concerning architects alleged to have engaged in unacceptable professional conduct or serious professional incompetence.

If an architect is found to have a case to answer, the allegation must be referred to the Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) for it to decide whether they are guilty.

ARB is now consulting on changes to these Rules in two draft documents:

• Draft Investigation Rules
• Draft Professional Conduct Committee Rules

Proposed changes

Among the changes entailed by the above documents would be:

• Case to Answer decision stage
  • Replace the three-member Investigations Panel with two Case Examiners (one lay, one architect)
  • Remove preliminary decisions and proceed directly to final decisions (seeking further evidence only where necessary)
  • Allow for appointment of a third Case Examiner where needed to reach a majority decision

• Review mechanisms
  • Replace external third-party reviews (TPR) with an internal review led by the Registrar
  • Introduce a new mechanism to reopen cases based on new evidence or information
  • Apply a two-year time limit for reopening cases (except in exceptional circumstances)

Have your say

More information on the current consultation is available here. The deadline for responses is Tuesday 12 May 2026.

RSUA is forming a response to this consultation. To share your views, please contact Curtis Large, RSUA Policy and Public Affairs Officer, at curtis@rsua.org.uk